Announcing...

The new "Redwood Office" of Fisher Company will be opening before this Christmas Season. Ribbon cutting ceremonies are scheduled on the 22nd of December. A high speed wireless internet satellite connection will be installed thus making it easier to conduct business from this location. This suggests increased efficiencies and implies more time will be spent at the offices there. This places us closer geographically to many of our west coast customers offering better service. Of course this will require some sacrifice on our part but we at Fisher Company are dedicated to servicing the needs of our many valued customers and are excited about this step forward in the evolution of our business.

A small reception is planned and we request confirmation if you should be able to attend. Menu items include smoked salmon, Calistoga water, various cheeses and pastries. Hope to see any of you there!

Best wishes from the Management

Let the party begin...

Stopped by the store on the way home tonight and picked up some goodies to begin the celebrations in anticipation of the Democratic sweep in the House and Senate tomorrow. Not to be overlooked either, in this mid term election, is the fact that this is a referendum for the failed policies of George W. Bush in Iraq.

We have Calistoga water with lime, two kinds of Pepperidge Farm cookies, French bread, Brie, cheddar aged two years, and bleu along with limited edition entertaining crackers from Nabisco called 'Hearty Wheats'. We'll put some Brie on those along with bleu and aged cheddar.

Do you suppose Karl and George, Dick, Donald and Condi are getting ready for any celebrating? In order to save face some have suggested Donald could be fired or retired. I promise one of these days I will post some of the great quotes from the Generals and the Joint Chiefs, how they feel about their Secretary of Defense from Bob Woodward's new book.

This is better than Christmas and New Years all rolled into one.

"Men behave differently...

in the presence of each other than they do when women are there. I could not begin to say why," according to Andy Rooney,” even if I knew. It is not only different, but the atmosphere, for that brief time, is often better. I should think the same thing is true about a group of women who gather for bridge or to elect a candidate to office. I can't speak about a woman's locker room."

I believe that observation by Mr. Rooney having experienced annual hunting trips to the mountains and diving trips to the ocean. I think that is why many of my friends continue to golf together on Saturday mornings, "for that brief time" that "is often better."

In pursuit of this special time I, J. and A. are having a men's afternoon out tomorrow. Yes, we can do this. I will be fortified with ample supplies in the diaper bag and do have some experience and ability, though dormant, to be able to change A's diaper if the need arises. We plan on visiting the Museum of Natural History at the U of U, probably make a stop at Toys R Us and then a stop at the Centerville Dairy Queen where we will drink root beer, eat ice cream and have ketchup and French fries. Topping off the afternoon will be some time on the living room carpet assembling and playing with our toys. After all is that not what men do best together?

Making progress with the problem of suffering...

From Save the Children I read that 4 million die in the first month of life. The leading causes of infant mortality are dehydration and disease. Major causes of infant mortality in more developed countries include congenital malformation, infection and SIDS. The most common cause of infant mortality of all children around the world has traditionally been dehydration from diarrhea. Because of the success of spreading information about Oral Rehydration Solution (a mixture of salts, sugar and water) to mothers around the world, the rate of children dying from dehydration has been decreasing and has become the second most common cause in the late 1990s. Currently the most common cause is pneumonia. Infanticide, abuse, abandonment, and neglect may also contribute to infant mortality.

In South Asia mothers often have no help in delivering other than a family member who is not trained in any way. The mothers give birth in the dirtiest part of the hut and the baby when it is delivered is laid on the dirt floor. Mothers are not allowed to nurse for the first week due to fears of evil spirits.

I am making progress with the problem of suffering. It is too personal to be posted on a blog but when it is quiet and we can talk in somewhat subdued tones I will share with you what I discovered about the problem of suffering including the children warriors of the Mai Mai in the Congo, the tens of thousands of children made orphans because of parents who died from AIDS as well as the starving in Darfur.

It is a start but it is somehwat a relief to me...

The view is a healthy one

An article in the Wall Street Journal Wednesday, October 18, 2006 reports, something all of us Noyo King crew members have known for a long time, that fishing and eating our catch is very healthy. I think hunting has a similar beneficial effect, particularly since the red meat we shoot is lower in cholesterol than chicken and is tetracyline and growth hormone free. Here are a couple paragraphs from the article:

By Elizabeth Bernstein, The Wall Street Journal

Health-conscious consumers have long been vexed by whether the health benefits of seafood outweigh the risks from toxic substances, such as mercury. Now, two large federally-funded studies have weighed the evidence and reached a definitive conclusion: Eat fish.

The reports -- one from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the other from Harvard Medical School, Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston -- analyzed hundreds of research studies and determined that eating seafood may help reduce the risk of heart disease in the general population. In particular, researchers at Harvard found that people who eat one to two servings of fish per week -- especially varieties higher in fatty oils, such as wild salmon -- may reduce their risk of death from heart attacks by 36 percent and the rate of death in general by 17 percent."

Sunday afternoons...

When I was a kid there was something on TV called 'Adventure Theater'. It came on Sunday afternoons after dinner and before church in the evening. I am sure I saw every Errol Flynn movie and 'Robin Hood' was my favorite. The likes of the Tarzan movies, starring the best of them all, Johnny Weissmuller, as well as Sherlock Holmes with Basil Rathbone were standard fare. Nazis were often the enemy of everyone. I miss the Charlie Chan series. My interest in the detective/drama genre has spanned the decades. The 'Inspector Morse' series on PBS is probably my favorite in recent years. 'Hill Street Blues' in its prime, minus the Francis and Joyce bathtub scenes, is likely a close second. There have been so many good ones it is hard to pick just one or two. Poirot with David Suchet deserves honorable mention, as does Helen Mirren's portrayal of DCS Jane Tennison also on PBS. PD James character Adam Dalgliesh has been made into several series and I have listened to a number of audio books on the I pod.

This afternoon in New York RA and I have the challenge of sorting through the online Zagat guide for restaurants in walking distance from the Marriott. Since we have been here we have had lunch at a French Brasserie, a Turkish supper of warm flat bread, humus and babaganoosh along with kabobs. Earlier today it was an Asian fusion Sunday brunch of dim sum.

The best activity on Sunday afternoons, (in addition to a nap), is dinner with family and enjoying the grandsons. I hope one day I can share the adventures of Charlie Chan with them. Of course they are sans any special effects and digital technology. I do not recall ever seeing a chase scene in any Hollywood movie until 1968 with Steve McQueen in 'Bullet'.

Grandson J has enjoyed the 'Pink Panther series with us but I wonder will anyone be interested in those classics of Adventure Theater?

Where is the outrage? This makes me sick!

I saw this Piece
on my Internet news provider, al Jazeera. I have to ask how can any of us sleep comfortably at night and know this kind of thing is happening? How can any of us hug a child or a grandson and know this sort of thing is going on and we are doing nothing about it? One of my grandsons is five, that means any time he could be taken by an army in the Congo. I ask myself why and I ask God why? I have no answers. How many grandchildren does George W. Bush, Dick Cheney have or Donald Rumsfeld? Where is the outrage? Where are those who could stop this? Who are the arms merchants supplying the combatants with their rocket propelled grenades, automatic weapons and small arms? Are the weapons, Russian, Chinese, or American?

To borrow from Sir Bertrand Russell, "The whole world of loneliness, poverty, and pain make a mockery of what human life should be. I long to alleviate this evil, but I cannot, and I too suffer."

A warning to you, if you read the following:

"At least 11,000 children in Congo are still missing or in the hands of armed groups three years after the end of the country's bloody civil war, a leading human rights group has said.

Amnesty International said on Wednesday that the Democratic Republic of Congo's scheme to release child soldiers - some of whom were as young as six-years-old - and reintegrate them into civilian life was failing.

"The government has not only failed to release thousands of children who remain with armed forces or groups but new child soldiers continue to be recruited, including some who were only recently demobilised and reunited with their families," said Tawanda Hondora, deputy director of Amnesty's Africa programme.

Some 40 per cent of children taken were young girls, most of whom remain unaccounted for.

Some government officials regarded them as "dependants" of adult fighters, who considered them sexual possessions and did not feel obliged to hand them over.

Most of the children who had been through the government reintegration scheme had since received little or no educational support or help to readjust, the organisation said.

"The new government must make it their first priority to ensure that all children associated with armed forces and groups are released, protected and provided with meaningful educational and income-generating opportunities to enable them to stay within their communities," Honduras said.

"This is the only way to prevent the re-recruitment and further abandonment of these children."

The central African country's five-year conflict, from 1998 until 2003, drew in six foreign armies, sparked a vast humanitarian crisis and claimed the lives of more than three million people.

It is currently preparing for a presidential run-off election on October 29 between Jean-Pierre Bemba, a former rebel chief turned vice president, and Joseph Kabila, current president of the country.

The run-off follows landmark July elections meant to smooth the transition of the former Zaire to democracy, although the elections have been marred by violence in the country's lawless north and north-east."

Notes from Peru

This is from my friend and adopted son in Peru. Some of you may recall he was deported from the Estados Unidos about two years ago. The digital image is a place K used to serve in Peru and is called San Juan de Lima. As we drove through the area I did not want to breathe because of the smell. It has garbage stacked along the one paved street. People and dogs sort through the trash looking for anything recyclable or edible, respectively. The little shack, nowhere near the quality of a 'Tough Shed' is built for families to drag home to some patch of rocks on the hillside. Miguel told me this area is not the worst of Peru as we could not drive there or we would not come out intact. You would find it interesting the very poorest live highest on the hillside, which is entirely devoid of any green or vegetation, no grass or trees.

The following was excerpted from the email I received today from Miguel. He is full of faith and rather stoic as he meets the challenges of his life and his family.

"I believe there is a reason for everything, there is a purpose for me being here in Peru and there is a purpose for everything that had happened to me in the course of my life.

I cannot understand why since I have being a little boy had a sense of belonging to something bigger and the presense of the spirit was always around me for diferent reasons I guess the lord want me to take care of a lot of things so he put me in the family I belong. for some reason it is my call to help my brothers my mom and my dad. is not something I decided to do it is just natural to me to do because the lord decide it was my call and for some reason I know it is.
I cannot say why but that is how it is I cannot complain because of that the lord always blessed me more than all my brothers and my family. I was always happy even in the bad times and always was able to help them even with money to go to the US. I can say that the lord always give the tools to do wath he wants me todo till the point I was not worry about money or food, because even when I used all my resourses to help others the lord somehow returned to me ten times more what I give to others over and over so I can say I always did good here in Peru even when things where so hard and jobs were so low and all it was because of the lord and his miracle ways to acomplish his purposes.

I feel very blessed George I love you and respect you a lot even more than my natural father. we are so a like that I know you understand my feelings, how I think my goals, dreams and plans. and that is why I feel very happy and atached to you. I can say that I see my self in you only that you are thousends better than me but I hope some day be as you are. and put others first than my self, just be focus on the gospel and the kingdom of the lord. so far this life is just temporary and a tiny piece of sand compared to the eternity of the kingdom of our heavenly father.

In my short 30's I can say I have being through a lot but at the same time I can say that my life had being full of privileges compared to others I have a lot. I'm rich as you said. in fact I feel I'm wealthy. I'm so happy because of the knowledge I have about the gospel. I'm priviledge to be a member of this wonderful church while other people are lost in the darkness of this world, I have the light and the guidance of the spirit the Malchisedec priesthood. I'm married to a wonderful woman will be soon sealed in the temple and will give the priesthod to my brother Renzo, as you can see and rich and blessed.

I know some people think they are not priviledge because they have being born in south america in a third world country where things are so hard and there is too much poverty, but I feel blessed because I know the road to the kingdom of my heavenly father it is not easy so i do not pretend to live in a fantasy world where everything is easy and you have everything that way you cannot apreciate what you have.

I'm looking forward to be there with you and my kids when they called you grandpa. I will let them know about you and let them know what I learned from you and how you helped others. I will show George Jr. how to be as his grandpa. and I will always set the example talking about you. they will go to missions and will bring souls to the lord. and all that will be possible because you helped this lost soul and rescue it from the darkness when others saw just another ilegal in trouble you extended your lovely hand to me helping me not expecting anything in return just showing the pure love of jesuschrist you have in your heart.

I will see you soon in the temple when I'll be sealed with Vanezza and you will be in my heart and toughs when i'll be giving the priesthood to Renzo. remember that all that is going to be posible because you decided to help just another ilegal in trouble who will never deserve all that you are doing for him. you have changed my life forever you are the biggest miracle in my life."

Our tinsel culture

Impossible for me to understand and it is damning evidence for this tinsel world in which we live. As Tom is now out at Paramount, Brad may be in for the highest amount ever paid to an actor, $39 million, to play the successor role of Ethan Hunt. From a Google web news piece you can read on...

"Newsmakers | Reports: Brad Pitt for the next 'Mission'
By Tirdad Derakhshani
Inquirer Staff Writer
Insiders and sources are talking (anonymously, of course). The groundswell is swelling: Paramount, which recently fired its golden boy Tom Cruise for his alleged weirdness, is gunning to have Brad Pitt replace Tom in the role of Main Studly Guy in the next installment of the Mission Impossible dynasty. At least, that's what various reports say that various other reports (in London's Daily Mail and the Evening Standard) are saying.

Brad apparently would not play Tom's Ethan Hunt character.

"They're set on Brad taking over as a gutsy new head operative who puts together his own unique team of specialists," an anonymous insider tells the Mail. (Ethan would be retired off to some sunny isle with his new wife.)

Paramount, the reports say, is being real gutsy by offering Brad $39 mil for the flick, which would make Angelina Jolie's beau the highest-paid actor in the history of thespianity"

Littering is permissible sometimes...

Every once in awhile things come across the stern that merit publication here. From one master:

"Each of us might well ask, “In what ways am I shrinking or holding back from discovery?” Even meek introspection and meditation may yield bold insights! For example, we can tell much by what we have already willingly discarded along the pathway of discovery. It is the only pathway where littering is permissible, even encouraged. In the early stages, the debris left behind includes the grosser acts of commission. Later debris differs; things begin to be discarded which have caused the misuse or underuse of our time, abilities and talent.

Along this pathway leading to light, stern and unsought challenges sometimes hasten the jettisoning, which is needed to achieve increased awakening. If we have grown soft, hard times may be necessary. If we are too contented, a dose of divine discontent may come. A relevant insight may be contained in reproof. A new duty beckons us away from comfortable routines wherein the needed competencies have already been developed. One may be stripped of accustomed luxury so that the malignant mole of materialism may be removed. One may be scorched by humiliation so pride can be melted away. Whatever we lack will get attention, one way or another. It is the way of things"

Aptitude tests and 'W'

I recall being in grade school and taking exams called the Stanford Achievement Tests. The questions were varied and some have stayed with me through the years as with other exams I took in high school and college. One of the kinds of questions designed to measure some sort of logic or aptitude was of this type -- 'A is to C as B is to D'.

We have enjoyed the recent discovery of Pink Panther movies by our grandson J. He is 11 and the humor of those wonderful movies spans the years between him and his grandparents.

I concluded, (based upon the wisdom gained in elementary school), that Inspector Clouseau is to police work as George W. Bush is to ______. (Fill in the blank)
A. The Presidency of the United States
B. World Peace
C. The environment
D. All of the above.

Is there is anything any better...

...I want to know. This AM after riding with RA to our office and back, she on the trike and me on the Stout, (and it was good again), we sat outside in the cool morning air having a pleasant Sunday AM visit. While sitting on the patio I saw a nectarine drop from the tree. I searched through the branches and found several perfect fruit. They are so juicy you have to lean over a sink to eat them or stay outside. They were cool because of autumn nights. They are so sweet.

I am accepting nominations from anyone who can claim they have anything equivalent to our tree ripened and nighttime cooled nectarines. Come by and we will share a couple with you, but don't ask for a bucket.

"No Human Being is Illegal"

This article in the Deseret News/Associated Press states Utah's immigrant population has grown significantly in the past five years, up 21.6 per cent. The Pew Hispanic Center estimates Utah's undocumented population between 75,000 and 100,000.

Because of the frustration and the apparent deadlock in Washington DC, states like Colorado have moved to fill the void with their own form of damage control. Rumor has it the extremists in the Utah Legislature are preparing bills to control, punish and persecute the undocumented among us. We and they love to send their sons and ours to Spanish speaking countries seeking converts to the predominant religion of this state and yet we do not want them to settle among us it seems.

A quick tour through our community or any with open eyes discloses how dependent we have become on this work force and vital minority in our society. Let me ask the questions: Who is it that mows the grass and tends our lawns? Who builds our houses? Who cooks our french fries? Who cleans the floors of the hospitals, empties the bed-pans, wipes our back sides and changes the linen when we cannot do it ourselves?

Senator Hatch and others suggest we must return them to their home countries. Has anyone tried a bus, train or airplane
recently?

Let's end this hold over from our American tradition of exploitation and slavery. Emancipate the undocumented. Allow them work permits and a path toward citizenship. Let's pay them reasonable wages, allow them health benefits and retirement. They will become even more valuable to our society and economy.

I hear the shouts and clamor for upholding the law. Does that mean if the minutemen and their fellow travelers lived in the days of the real minutemen of the colonial era, would they be shouting to uphold King George and British rule over the colonies?

From a Catholic web site I found something touching upon immigration. After the infant Jesus was no more than a few days old, he, his mother Mary and her husband Joseph had to flee to Egypt. They were immigrants and King Herod's version of Homeland Security was searching for them. Jesus proved to be very uncomfortable for the ruling party later in life, a very polarizing influence in his society.

In the final analysis his message is still the same today for all of us. "Blessed are the poor and the meek and hungry..." Let us bless and not curse them, realize we are all beggars and we depend on him for all we have.

Why do we like Northern CA?

This image is from the Mendocino Headlands State Park. We have spent many a day snorkeling and diving in these waters. Em captured her first abalone here. Lot's of memories...

Sir Bertrand Russell on life

"What I Have Lived For...

Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. These passions, like great winds, have blown me hither and thither, in a wayward course, over a great ocean of anguish, reaching to the very verge of despair.

I have sought love, first, because it brings ecstasy - ecstasy so great that I would often have sacrificed all the rest of life for a few hours of this joy. I have sought it, next, because it relieves loneliness--that terrible loneliness in which one shivering consciousness looks over the rim of the world into the cold unfathomable lifeless abyss. I have sought it finally, because in the union of love I have seen, in a mystic miniature, the prefiguring vision of the heaven that saints and poets have imagined. This is what I sought, and though it might seem too good for human life, this is what--at last--I have found.

With equal passion I have sought knowledge. I have wished to understand the hearts of men. I have wished to know why the stars shine. And I have tried to apprehend the Pythagorean power by which number holds sway above the flux. A little of this, but not much, I have achieved.

Love and knowledge, so far as they were possible, led upward toward the heavens. But always pity brought me back to earth. Echoes of cries of pain reverberate in my heart. Children in famine, victims tortured by oppressors, helpless old people a burden to their sons, and the whole world of loneliness, poverty, and pain make a mockery of what human life should be. I long to alleviate this evil, but I cannot, and I too suffer.

This has been my life. I have found it worth living, and would gladly live it again if the chance were offered me."

Wal Mart and the "rule of law"

Our former mayor in Centerville and his cohorts spoke incessantly about the "rule of law", essentially dictating to us why the monster store could not be kept out of the heart of our city. Well, it seems that a bunch of folk in California have concluded it is fair and legal to ban them from your town. The California State's Supreme Court agreed with the locals who opposed the Wal Martization of their communities.

Apparently, the brain trust of the mayor, city manager and their legal advisors got it wrong or maybe they did not want to get it right in the final analysis.

Here is the article:

The California Supreme Court rejected Wal-Mart's appeal Wednesday of a ruling that allows cities and counties in the state to outlaw big-box superstores.

The April 5 ruling by the Court of Appeal in Fresno upheld an ordinance enacted in 2004 by Turlock (Stanislaus County) that was backed by neighborhood supermarkets and labor unions. The court, setting a statewide precedent, said local governments can enact such restrictions to prevent the collapse of local businesses and resulting urban blight.

The state's high court denied review Wednesday without comment.

It was Turlock's second legal victory over Wal-Mart this month. On July 3, a federal judge in Fresno dismissed the company's constitutional challenge to the ordinance, saying the city was not interfering with interstate commerce or discriminating illegally against one type of store.

Rick Jarvis, a lawyer for Turlock, said Wednesday's state court action allows a city to "make its own land-use plans and decide for itself what's good for the community.'' It will also "make it much more difficult for Wal-Mart to file expensive legal challenges against other jurisdictions that decide to adopt similar ordinances,'' he said.

Wal-Mart spokesman John Simley said the company was disappointed but believed the effect of the Turlock law would be limited. The appeals court ruling "is narrowly based on facts that are specific to Turlock,'' he said.

He said Wal-Mart had not yet decided whether to appeal last week's federal court ruling.

The Arkansas-based retail giant has been trying to establish a California network of discount supercenters -- stores that exceed 100,000 square feet and contain full-size grocery stores -- and has encountered resistance.

Wal-Mart estimates that 20 cities and counties in Northern California have passed ordinances seeking to limit or block the stores. San Francisco, Oakland and Martinez have banned them.

A ban on supercenters in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County was enacted by the Board of Supervisors in 2003 but repealed by voters in 2004. Alameda County supervisors then rescinded a similar ordinance, but adopted a more limited measure this March that requires big-box retailers to describe the effect of new stores on the local economy and give details of employees' pay and benefits.

Turlock has a Wal-Mart store but responded to the company's plans for a supercenter by passing the ordinance in 2004. Without mentioning Wal-Mart, the law prohibits any retail store larger than 100,000 feet that devotes more than 5 percent of its space to nontaxable items such as groceries. The City Council said the purpose was to preserve neighborhood shopping centers.

In its April 5 ruling, the appeals court said the city's motives were legal, even if its action hurt competition.

"While zoning ordinances may not legitimately be used to control economic competition, they may be used to address the urban/suburban decay'' that can result from the entry of a large new business, the court said.


The case is Wal-Mart Stores vs. Turlock, S143488.

E-mail Bob Egelko at begelko@sfchronicle.com.

...para poder montar rápidamente

Q brought this interesting article to my attention and it merits a post. The question is how far can you ride in an hour? I think I hit 13 miles last week without too much strain.

"Thirty years after making the United States Olympic Cycling team, twenty years after winning the DuPont Prize for human-powered speed and ten years after retiring from professional cycling, "Fast" Freddy Markham won the Dempsey-MacCready Prize at the Nissan One Hour Challenge last week. He covered 53.43 miles in one hour, setting a world record, in his super-efficient Easy Racer recumbent bicycle. Markham, at age 49, wasn't considered a serious contender for a title or the record; he has won the One Hour Challenge three times previously, but not since 1989. As the owner of Easy Racers, Inc., the nation's largest recumbent bicycle manufacturer, he knows a thing or two about making bikes go fast; we tip our hat to him for proving that it's still tough to be a bicycle for getting yourself from here to there. Want to go 50 miles in an hour on a bike? He'll sell you an Easy Racer and you'll be halfway there."

Opponents of Global Warming...

Reasons given by opponents of the global warming theory from the online encyclopedia Wikipedia:

"Some of the assertions made in opposition to the global warming theory include:
IPCC draws firm conclusions unjustified by the science, especially given the acknowledged weakness of cloud physics in the climate models. For example, even those who accept that there is a warming trend point out that there is a big difference between correlation and causality. In other words, just because temperatures have generally been rising since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, that doesn't necessarily mean that the Industrial Revolution has caused the change in temperature (see post hoc, ergo propter hoc argument). On the other hand, the period since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution has indeed produced ever-growing "urban heat islands" (see below) that could be skewing temperature measurements that indicate the recent warming.

Using "consensus" as evidence is an appeal to the majority argument rather than scientific discussion. Ergo, because the issue has become so politicized, it is suspected that climatologists who disagree with the consensus as it is may be afraid to speak out for fear of losing their positions or funding.

Consensus is further compromised in this field of study due to students being attracted to the field by their belief that something should be done about global warming. They complete their education and add their voices to the consensus, which gives a perceived bias.

Earth's climate has been both colder and warmer than today, and these changes are adequately explained by mechanisms that do not involve human greenhouse gas emissions. There is no significant global warming relative to the expected natural trends.

CO2 in the atmosphere is mainly volcanic in origin, accounting for 97% of the CO2 found in the atmosphere, most of which travels to the oceans. Estimates at CO2's effectiveness as a greenhouse gas vary, but are generally around 10-100 times lower than water weight for weight, leaving a "net" greenhouse effect of man-made CO2 emissions at less than 1%.

Climate science can not make definitive predictions yet, since the computer models used to make these predictions are still evolving and do not yet take into account recently discovered feedback mechanisms. Climate models will not be able to predict the future climate until they can predict solar and volcanic activity.

Some global warming studies have errors or have not been reproduced. Global temperatures are directly related to such factors as: sunspot activity (an 11-year cycle).

The concern about global warming is analogous to the concern about global cooling in the 1970s. The concern about global cooling was unnecessarily alarmist. The concern about global warming is equally alarmist.

Some opponents of global warming theory give more weight to data such as paleoclimatic studies, temperature measurements made from weather balloons, and satellites which they claim show less warming than surface land and sea records, though early balloon records have been shown to be possibly erroneous due to mechanical design flaws in the sensors.

Opponents tend to define themselves in terms of opposition to the IPCC position. They generally believe that climate science is not yet able to provide us with solid answers to all the major questions about the global climate.

Opponents frequently characterise supporters arguments as alarmist and premature, so as to emphasize what they perceive as the lack of scientific evidence supporting global warming scenarios.

Opponents also say that if global warming is real and man-made, no action need be taken now because:
Future scientific advances or engineering projects will remedy the problem before it becomes serious and for less money.
A small amount of global warming would be benign or even beneficial, as increased carbon dioxide would benefit plant life, thus potentially becoming profitable for agriculture world-wide.
There is a distinct correlation between GDP growth and greenhouse gas emissions. A cutback in emissions might lead to a decrease in the rate of GDP growth."

Proponents of the Global Warming theory...

This is from the online encyclopedia Wikipedia:

"Reasons given by supporters of the global warming theory:
Supporters of the global warming theory assert that gas bubbles trapped in ice cores give us a detailed record of atmospheric chemistry and temperature back more than four hundred thousand years, with the temperature record confirmed by other geologic evidence. This record tells us that carbon dioxide and temperature rise and fall tightly together.

The recent rise in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases is greater than any in hundreds of thousands of years and this is human-caused, shown by isotopic signature of CO2 from fossil fuels. We know carbon dioxide captures IR radiation and converts it to heat because we use these physics to measure carbon dioxide concentration the historical temperature record shows a rise of 0.4–0.8 °C over the last 100 years. The urban heat island effect makes no significant contribution.

The current warmth is unusual in the past 1000 years (see Temperature record of the past 1000 years).

The warming of the last 50 years is likely caused by human activity (see attribution of recent climate change), using analysis based on climate modeling; and that natural variability or solar variation cannot explain the recent change.

Carbon dioxide is a first order forcing on climate change—other effects such as water vapour greenhouse effects are either roughly constant over time, act as amplifiers, or do not have a large effect. Humankind is performing a great geophysical experiment and if it turns out badly—however that is defined—we cannot undo it. We cannot even abruptly turn it off. Too many of the things we are doing now have long-term ramifications for centuries into the future. Climate models can reproduce this trend, but only when using greenhouse gas.

Climate models predict more warming, and other climate effects (sea level rise, more frequent and severe storms, drought and heat waves, etc) in the future. For instance, Atlantic hurricane trends have been recently linked to climate change, June 2006. Action should be taken now to prevent or mitigate warming (see Precautionary principle).

The IPCC reports correctly summarise the state of climate science. There is a scientific consensus behind all of the above.
Our existence is poised within a fluid-dynamic, ocean-atmosphere-biosphere system, where non-linear feedbacks are common and where climate states are only relatively stable (i.e., "metastable"). Unknown unknowns are likely to surprise us, particularly if they trigger a non-linear, positive feedback that flips climate to a new meta-stable state.

Proponents of global warming tend to support the IPCC position and thus represent a broadly unified viewpoint, though with considerable differences over what action should be taken. Optionally, supporters may go on to point out that there is a good chance that the future changes may be undesirable, and that planning to avoid or mitigate them would be a good idea. Only 2 of the 120 contributing authors to the IPCC TAR are known to have voiced any complaint.

Science Magazine analyzed 928 peer-reviewed scientific papers on global warming published between 1993 and 2003 (Oreskes, 2004). Not a single one challenged the scientific consensus the earth’s temperature is rising due to human
activity."

The IPCC referred to is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and was established in 1988 by two United Nations organizations, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to assess the "risk of human-induced climate change". The Panel is open to all members of the WMO and UNEP.

IPCC reports are widely cited in almost any debate related to climate change. The reports have been influential in forming national and international responses to climate change. A small but vocal minority (less than 1.5%) of the scientists involved with the report have accused the IPCC of bias.

Cycling is good...but how much?

I found this info from Ken Kiefer's 'Bike Pages' on the net:

"One very interesting question is how much aerobic exercise should one get every day? Some medical authorities recommend as little as 20 minutes a day, three times a week, while others recommend 2,000 kCal, which would be at least four times that amount. Why the great difference? Well, most authorities recognize the more exercise the better up to some undetermined point, but many are afraid that if they expect too much, people won't exercise at all. Another reason for lowering the recommendation was due to the damage caused by jogging, a problem cycling does not share. I am afraid that those setting very low requirements are giving people the mistaken impression that they don't need any more exercise than their usual, basically sedentary activity.

How much exercise do I recommend? I find that 45 minutes of cycling six days a week (about 2,000 kCal) keeps me feeling good, but not great, two hours per day keeps me very strong and controls my weight, and six hours a day on my bicycle trips makes me feel like superman after several weeks. We might say that lower amounts of exercise improve one's health and higher amounts improve one's fitness. I would recommend a minumum of 45 minutes a day and as much addition cycling as time permits. The time spent cycling will not be wasted; in addition to having a good ride, the cyclist will be more productive during the remaining time and will live longer as well."

I find riding every day to be too much for me as I need recovery time. Two hours every other day seems to be comfortable for the present in allowing joints and ligaments to recover. I seem to be losing FAT at this schedule, The 19" shirts are roomier and I have dropped back successfully to 18 1/2" size after two months. The belt is one or 1-1/2 nothes tighter too. Who has time for 6 hours a day in the saddle?